Personal Docs

Suggestion for the forthcoming Synod

As the Synod on the Word of God comes up, I too thought of taking the liberty of making my own contribution to the Synod. I am an ordinary priest in the Archdiocese of Bombay through the special blessing of God and through the intervention of Cardinal Ivan Dias the now Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Propagation of Faith. I also conduct a practical retreat programme aimed at developing in individuals the disciplines to walk in constant discernment and God’s holy grace.

The New approach to God’s Word

The Word of God is treated with much more reverence and literalness in the Catholic Church. This reality has never filtered down to the faithful even after Dei Verbum and other post Conciliar efforts in this direction. We have the truth in a measure far greater than the others and this reality is made visible in our liturgical celebrations. Yet to the majority it is still a mystery. A diagnosis shows us that the fault must be in the system of filtration: the hierarchy and the clergy which is not equipped fully to filter the truths of the Word of God, to the laity, which is so richly present in our liturgy.

We give reverence to the Word of God and even stand with all acclamation to receive the Good News of Salvation during Eucharistic celebrations. There is the great emphasis at our Agape on the breaking of the Word of God and as if to complete this reality we unlike most of our separated brethrens believe that when the Word of God is proclaimed by His anointed ones to the bread and cup of wine it becomes the body and blood, the soul and divinity of our beloved Lord and Saviour - the seeds of expectant faith! Yet the reality in practice is the other way. The Protestants dwell more on the Word and have more of the expectant faith than we Catholics. Where is the fault? I believe the flaw is in the filtration system - the hierarchy, the clergy, yet I do not blame them as individuals because the flaw is in the system that produces this arrangement, i.e. our houses of formation - the seminaries.

Primarily, our attitude towards God’s Word is more rational at the ordinary level, so much so that the divine is often neglected in our actions. This above statement if understood, corrected and acted upon, then there could be a tremendous transformation in the Catholic Church.  For example, there are priests who have shared how they have stopped or discouraged people from simultaneously reading the Word from their pocket lectionary when the Word of God was being read. Their reason: “God’s Word should not be read privately when it is proclaimed aloud within the Eucharistic celebration. It should be heard rather than read” This I believe is a serious fallacy which needs to be urgently corrected.


It is true that God’s Word is to be heard, for the Scripture itself exhorts us thus;” So faith comes from what is heard, and what is heard comes through the word of Christ" (Reematos Christou).” Rom 10:17(NRSV). (The Synod fathers could dwell on this Word from scripture) I believe this message is not understood in the way it is to be understood. God’s Word comes to us through a human instrument (in the language of men). When it is said that faith comes by hearing, it is not that all who hear actually believe, There can be proclamation and preaching and reading and yet it is an empirical fact that they do not always create faith. Even the scripture is replete with examples of nations rejecting the message proclaimed to them even by God’s anointed servants. 

What then is the missing factor? Where then is the flaw? The scripture clearly tell us that it has to be the message of Christ or word of Christ (Reematos Christou). i.e. even though we may listen to a speaker or preacher or a reader we will yet never have that faith if we don’t listen to the message of Christ in our hearts – a separate listening! One person, two ears hearing two different sources: one ear listens to the human message and the other ear listens to the Reematos Christou! The second ear opens up despite the first and it opens up all the more if there is the anointing of Christ in the message and in the environment. It still seems as if the whole thing is dependant on the human instrument but at the same time one should not forget the divine role in gifting us with that great gift of faith to believe in the message.

When there is this humility then NO preacher will ever think of stopping any one in the pews from reading their pocket lectionary and following the readings at Mass. What is more we would even be encouraging it - our bright model Church of the future. This is an important understanding; it can change the face of the Church of God and the Catholic attitude to God’s Word even in our seminary formation.

From a situation of mere external reverence it will bring God’s Word to the internal realm of our liturgical celebrations and life. By proclaiming and developing the passivity of listening we will have an active laity bringing their Bibles and pocket lectionaries for a Eucharistic celebration rather than be mere passives and many a times distracted listeners. We will recognize that their efforts to prayerfully read God’s Word diligently in any situation will help them to listen to the Reematos Christou.

Belief in the Reematos Christou will open the flood gates of signs and wonders in the Church, the foundation of which already exists with our belief in the Eucharistic process and presence. If signs and wonders exist, then witnessing by deeds (not just in behaviour patterns and good character and fruit of the Spirit) will be powerful. As we see in the witness of Christ to John the Baptist: "Are you the one who was to come, or should we expect someone else?" Jesus replied, "Go back and report to John what you hear and see:  The blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who have leprosy are cured, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the good news is preached to the poor.  Blessed is the man who does not fall away on account of me."  Matt 11:3-6

How can this be a reality in the Catholic Church? The right diagnoses leads to right medications. It is orthodoxy that leads to orthopraxis. There is a need to have a serious relook at the formation of our future priests. Especially the first few and the last years should be spent in a proper grounding in Scripture based on a prayerful approach rather than an intellectual approach. The primary purpose of such a formation should be aimed at developing in the individuals an attitude of expectant faith in the Reematos Christou rather than an intellectual scientific approach, abstract and far removed from reality. The training should be in contemplation on God’s Word (Lectio Divina) whereby one grows in listening to the voice of God through the medium/vehicle of Scripture. In the absence of this aspect God’s Word could be even misleading rather than lead to faith. “You search the scriptures, because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness to me; yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life”.  John 5:39-40 (RSV). Their refusal is due to their absence of expectant faith even though they have been experts in God’s Word.

Let me reiterate, at present the whole training in Scripture is abstract intellectual and intangible, far removed from the reality of life. At times there is more isogesis than exegesis. That too this training comes about in most seminaries in spurts and a major part of it is after studying philosophy. This is as if to say that our intellect will be much sharpened to understand scriptures and theology after we have studied philosophy.

This I am convinced is a wrong approach to the whole dynamics of our faith.  It is our carnal mind which first needs to be formed and molded i.e. enlightened in that faith which comes through the Word of God (Rm.12:2, 2Tim.3:15-17). Then transformed and renewed through God’s Word, we will be able to reach that peak of intellect which enables us to understand even the depth of the mystery of God and the lacunae in every human intellect and philosophies. “The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned. The spiritual man makes judgments about all things, but he himself is not subject to any man's judgment: "For who has known the mind of the Lord that he may instruct him?” But we have the mind of Christ.”1 Cor 2:14-16. Faith and reason here are not two parallels, they are not on the same footing,  it is faith which is the ultimate and what is required and necessary if reason follows then it is well and good if not we will still find our salvation through the  servile obedience of faith. “Through him and for his name's sake, we received grace and apostleship to call people from among all the Gentiles to the obedience that comes from faith”. Rom 1:5 “For in the gospel righteousness from God is revealed, a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written: The righteous will live by faith."   Rom 1:17 (Rm.3:22, 28; Gal.3:8). This affirmation of faith over reason is also strongly advocated in ‘Fides et Ratio’.

It is not knowledge that will save us as we stand before kings and governors but our dependence on God; not knowledge through learning but wisdom which scripture points as divine gift for those who fear him (Ps.111:10, Pr.1:7). Therefore, faith is that firm foundation, the rock on which Christ has built his church and if we don’t build on this foundation then it will crumble and disintegrate. This in no way will compromise the Catholic faith but rather will make it much more vibrant and scripture based. Our clergy will be able to argue about the faith with the Protestant and even present the faith to the masses with the Bible as the basis and may never find themselves lacking or diffident in presenting a defense of their faith. We today have a clergy that shies away from proclaiming God’s Word and are more comfortable in proclaiming a message that has an apparent sense of spirituality but in its depth is more worldly and unspiritual.

What is more this familiarity with scripture will even boost ecumenism since the Bible is used as a basis by almost all the churches. Except for us and some communities it is not going to be sola Scriptura.  There will be a re-emphasis on the use of the rich tradition the Catholic church exists in and a constant reference to magisterium.

Let’s look at the problem the other way; I am being empirical and situational; for any individual the most beautiful, ordinary and easy means at their disposal to have an access to the faith is the Bible. This holds true all the more for our separated brethren, especially in the new religious movements spreading across the world.  Here again if we through our seminary training and formation develop a familiarity and approach through the Bible then we shall have priests who will be not only priests of expectant faith but will be able to reach out to people at their most ordinary level. The future Church of God will have liturgical celebrations with a laity carrying their Bibles even to Church.

Also, we look at scripture as Canonical – a sure doctrine and so too experience teaches us that God speaks best especially to a confused soul through a base foundation or else scripture in itself can mislead or we could be misleading ourselves much more easily without basing ourselves on the foundations which Christ has laid.  The contemplation method of the early Church fathers and such greats as St. Ignatius and St. Francis de Sales recommends the scripture as a base foundation for contemplation. This again should encourage us enough to take this step to move in a direction in learning all our theology from the standpoint of the Word of God. In other words most of theology is supported by God’s Word hence the methodology should be that of approaching it through God’s Word.

This approach could even change the quality of sermons as they would be based on God’s Word and at the same time the priests will speak a universal language of the scripture which would be understood by all who have read and heard God’s Word. Then there will be a true breaking of God’s Word. He will also be well versed with the contemplative method in preparing his sermon and hence will not be overtly dependant on already prepared sermons of others.

The need for a radical change in the Church is urgent and it should be brought about with a strong catechesis based on God’s Word. I am convinced that if these changes are implemented in our formation houses it will have a cascading effect in the church. The trend of people leaving the church even en masse in some countries could be reversed. For we have the truth based and supported by a strong traditare.

I believe this Synod on the Word of God is a beautiful opportunity for the Church to renew itself in a new and dynamic way.  This renewal which is suggested is not new but has already existed in some measure before Trent. Hence we will once again be drawing from a tradition which is Catholic.

I deeply appreciate Pope Benedict’s XVI priorities and commitments for the Church of God ever since he has taken over the reigns.

Fr. Conrad Saldanha

August, 2007

No comments:

Post a Comment